According to recent reports, the United States government is planning to redirect $62 million in funding from the World Health Organization (WHO) to a number of groups committed to promoting reproductive health and rights. This move comes in response to the Trump administration’s dissatisfaction with WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The funds will be diverted to organizations such as the United Nations Population Fund, which provides family planning services to over 150 countries, and the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which operates in 160 countries worldwide. These groups are expected to use the funding to support their family planning and reproductive health initiatives, which include sex education, contraception, and maternal health care.

Advocates for women’s health and rights have praised this move, saying that it demonstrates a commitment to promoting global health and reproductive rights, particularly in the developing world. However, critics have argued that the Trump administration’s real motive is to defund organizations that provide abortion services or information.

In addition to the funding redirection, the Trump administration has also made a series of controversial decisions regarding healthcare policy during the pandemic. These include rolling back restrictions on telemedicine for abortion services and issuing a rule which weakens nondiscrimination protections for transgender people in healthcare settings.

Despite these moves, the Trump administration has been widely criticized for its handling of the pandemic, which has led to over 100,000 deaths in the United States alone. Many experts argue that inadequate testing and tracing, as well as a lack of federal leadership, are to blame for the country’s high death toll.

As the pandemic continues to ravage the world, it remains to be seen how the United States will navigate its relationship with WHO and other global health organizations. However, the redirection of this funding suggests that the Trump administration is committed to promoting reproductive health and rights, even as it faces criticism for its broader policies.


According to

The material in this article is written on the basis of another article.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *